Impactable Alternatives: 9 LinkedIn Ads Agencies Compared [2026]

Disclosure and methodology

Kiin is a LinkedIn Ads agency, we compete with Impactable, and we are first on this list. Impactable is several times our size and holds LinkedIn partner credentials that almost no agency has, and you should weigh everything below knowing who wrote it. Every fact about another agency was read from that agency’s own website on 26 October 2026, and where something is not stated the entry says so rather than guessing.

Scored on four things: whether the channels run as one programme with one budget owner, what gets measured, pricing transparency, and verifiable credentials. Not scored on size, awards or website design.

How to read any alternatives page, including this one. It was written by a competitor of the agency in the title. That is true of almost every page ranking for this search, and most of them do not say so. Check whether the incumbent is described accurately enough that you would recognise it, whether the page says where the incumbent is still the better choice, and whether the facts carry a date. If every line about the named agency is unflattering, you are reading an advert rather than a comparison.

Why people look for an Impactable alternative

Impactable is one of the most visible LinkedIn led agencies in the US, it publishes its prices, and its partnership with LinkedIn is real. The reasons people search for an alternative are about what kind of thing they are buying.

The tiers are tied to ad spend ceilings. Publishing prices is a strength. But the Core tier covers one channel up to $15,000 a month of ad spend and Growth covers two channels up to $25,000 combined, so scaling your media moves you up a tier. Worth calculating the fee at next year’s budget, not this quarter’s.

A system, not just a channel. Impactable describes itself as a demand intelligence system: LinkedIn as the signals hub, the DemandSense platform underneath, and web visitor identification, Conversions API and CRM sync added at higher tiers. If you want that system, it is the point. If you want LinkedIn run well and reported honestly, it can be more than you need.

Rapid growth. From a LinkedIn lead generation business launched in 2020 to 70+ experts across 8+ channels and 250+ active clients, including two acquisitions in 2024. Growth like that is evidence of demand. It also makes it worth asking who exactly would run your account and how many others they run.

Breadth around the core. Paid search, Facebook, programmatic, thought leadership and outreach sit around LinkedIn. Some buyers want exactly that; others want a smaller team that goes deeper on one or two channels.

Impactable at a glance

Read from impactable.com (home, about and pricing pages) on 26 October 2026. Scale and results claims are the agency’s own and we have not independently verified them.

Nine alternatives

1. Kiin — best if you want the people doing the work on the call

London, serving US, UK and EU, founded 2019. Eight people, three of them from LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, and the person who builds your campaigns is the person on your weekly call. Published, flat fees: LinkedIn Ads or Google Ads on its own $2,500 a month (about £1,900), LinkedIn and Google together $4,500 (about £3,350), full paid media across LinkedIn, Google, Meta and Reddit $5,500 (about £4,150), and GTM outbound as an add-on from $4,000 (about £3,100). No setup fee, no markup on media, a three month initial commitment and then rolling. Every account is benchmarked against Kiin Labs, our panel of $65M+ of LinkedIn Ads spend across 1,000+ advertiser accounts, rather than against our own client list. The fee does not step up with your ad spend. Where Impactable sells a system with a platform underneath, we sell senior people running LinkedIn and Google from one budget, and LinkedIn engagement signals feed outbound from the same dataset when you add GTM outbound. Tradeoff: we are eight people, against Impactable’s 70+, and we hold neither its LinkedIn partnership agreement nor its Conversions API certification. We have no programmatic desk. Working with us needs about $5,000 a month in ad spend (about £3,700); you can run LinkedIn on less, but the targeting has to be tight.

2. B2Linked — best for pure LinkedIn specialism with the longest record

US (Utah). LinkedIn Ads and nothing else since 2014: “LinkedIn Ads is all we do.” Founder AJ Wilcox hosts The LinkedIn Ads Show. States $150M+ spent on the platform, 800+ accounts audited, 1,000+ businesses helped, 12 team members, and work with five of LinkedIn’s ten largest spending ad accounts. Pricing is published: under $15,000 a month of ad spend, $3,000 a month plus a $1,000 setup fee on a three month contract; above $15,000, a sliding 20% to 6% of spend. A one off audit is $2,000, courses and community $279 a month, and consulting with AJ Wilcox $450 an hour. Named results include Qualio (pipeline up 52%, 550% ROAS) and Hired (cost per qualified applicant down 87%). Tradeoff: LinkedIn only, so Google and Meta are somebody else’s job, and above $15,000 a month the fee grows with your media rather than with the work.

3. AdConversion — best for priced lines across LinkedIn, Google and Meta at higher spend

B2B SaaS only. Paid search, paid social, programmatic and review site advertising, with creative, conversion rate optimisation and RevOps sold as separate lines, each with a published starting price: performance media from $8,600 a month, creative from $1,760, CRO from $3,323, RevOps from $9,000, and an AI ad automation product, Sami, at $2,500 a month flat with a promise to cut 30% of wasted spend or pay you back. Flat fees, zero percent of ad spend. States $100M+ of B2B ad spend managed and 11,000+ marketers trained through its free academy. Tradeoff: quarterly plans with 90 days’ notice, and a media management floor that only makes sense at substantial spend. LinkedIn is one channel among several rather than the practice.

4. GrowthSpree — best for multi channel B2B SaaS on a month to month fee

Headquartered in New York, focused on B2B SaaS. Google, LinkedIn, Meta, Reddit, Capterra, G2 and ChatGPT ads run alongside ABM, RevOps and answer engine work as one system. States 300+ clients, $60M+ of ad spend managed, 4.9 on G2 from 49 reviews, and Google Partner and LinkedIn Partner status. A flat monthly fee, month to month, with no commitment. Publishes specific client numbers, for example Rocketlane at 36% lower cost per demo. Tradeoff: the fee itself is not on the site, the client numbers are its own, and with seven ad platforms on the menu LinkedIn is one line of the plan.

5. DowSocial — best for UK teams who want LinkedIn built properly, then run in house

Peterborough, UK. A B2B LinkedIn Ads agency (“LinkedIn Ads are our main focus, not one channel among ten”) with thought leader ads as a named specialism. Fixed, published prices: in house training from £995 plus VAT, a 30 day set up from £1,299, and a 90 day Kickstart from £2,750 for the full 90 days. Ongoing management is priced on request. The founder, Kristian Downer, has delivered training on behalf of Google, Meta and Vodafone, and named clients include Skanska, Securitas and Bayes Business School. The only option here built to hand a properly set up account back to your own team. Tradeoff: a small specialist with a UK client base; the managed retainer is not published.

6. Linkads — best for French speaking markets with a flat fee at any spend

Paris and Geneva, founded 2023. A collective dedicated entirely to B2B LinkedIn Ads (“On ne fait que ça”). Published fixed fees of 1,890 a month for the standard service and 2,490 for premium, which adds four executive LinkedIn posts a month; the site does not state the currency. No media commission and monthly contracts you can cancel at any time. States 50+ B2B clients since 2023 and more than €5M of LinkedIn Ads budget managed. Tradeoff: young, and French language first. An English speaking team running US campaigns should check who would work the account.

7. KlientBoost — best for priced recommendations before you sign

US. Paid search, paid social and conversion rate optimisation run together. States it hit 84% of client goals in Q3 2026 and that it adds resources free when an account is pacing behind. Its free marketing plan prices each recommendation; the worked example on its homepage shows a LinkedIn Ads spend increase at $7,500 a month. Tradeoff: a large multi channel agency. LinkedIn is one line on the plan rather than the practice.

8. Refine Labs — best for a strategy led demand programme with a published rate card

US. B2B demand generation, and one of the few agencies at this tier that puts a rate card on its website: paid media management from $14,000 a month on a six month minimum, full demand and media from $26,000, creative only from $5,000, and a six week Revenue Performance Assessment from $35,000. If what you want is a demand programme with strategy above the media buying, priced before the first call, this is it. Tradeoff: the floor is real and deliberate. On a LinkedIn budget of a few thousand dollars a month, a $14,000 management fee is the wrong shape whatever the quality of the work. (Refine Labs alternatives.)

9. Directive — best for enterprise multi channel at scale

US. One of the largest B2B performance agencies: states 130+ marketing strategists, 700+ brands served and $1B+ in revenue generated, across Performance, Commerce and Communications divisions, with logos including Adobe, Cisco, Calendly, Gong and ZoomInfo. Pricing not published. Tradeoff: breadth and scale rather than LinkedIn depth, and no numbers until you are in a sales process. A LinkedIn only budget would be a small account there. (Directive alternatives.)

Side by side

What the media costs, so you can size the fee against it

Agency fees only mean something next to the media they manage. Every cost figure below comes from Kiin Labs: $65M+ of LinkedIn Ads spend across 1,000+ advertiser accounts in the twelve months to 7 September 2026. Medians across advertiser accounts, never pooled totals. LinkedIn Audience Network excluded. Every click is a landing page click, not LinkedIn’s default click field.

Two findings matter more than any fee when you compare LinkedIn specialists. Letting LinkedIn bid on maximum delivery cost 103% more per website click than a manual bid in the same account, across 90 accounts. And one in four lead gen campaigns never produced a single lead: 1,486 campaigns spent $100 or more with zero leads, $1.30M between them, and in 85% of them people opened the form and nobody submitted it (Report No. 5). Ask every agency on this list how it bids and what it does about form abandonment. The answer moves your cost per lead more than the difference between any two fees on this page.

One more, because Impactable’s model is built on moving engaged accounts from the feed into other channels. In our demo request study, the same advertiser paid 57% less per demo lead in the inbox than in the feed, because a demo form in a message completes 42% of the time and in the feed 3.9% (Report No. 4). Where the ask sits matters as much as who sees it, whichever agency you choose.

When Impactable is still the right answer

If you want LinkedIn engagement signals to drive retargeting, outreach and paid search, with Conversions API and CRM sync built for you, and you value an agency with a formal LinkedIn partnership agreement and Conversions API certification, Impactable is built for exactly that and nobody else on this list can match the credentials. The same is true if you sell into cybersecurity or financial services, where it has dedicated practices, or if you want to start small: the Demand Engine at $1,750 a month is a lower entry point than most managed retainers here, ours included.

How to choose

Start with the shape of your spend. LinkedIn only points to a LinkedIn specialist. LinkedIn plus search points to someone who will run both from one budget, because if they are judged separately the cheaper cost per lead column wins the budget every quarter. Then work out the fee at your next budget, not your current one. Flat fees, tiers capped by spend and percentages of spend give very different answers at twice the media. Then ask who does the work. Ask which named individuals are on your account, what else they are on, and whether the people in the pitch are among them. Then test the measurement. Ask what the month three report contains. Pipeline by account, landing page clicks rather than LinkedIn’s default click field, and a self reported attribution question on the booking form is a good answer. A dashboard of impressions and CTR is not. Then check the tradeoff is stated. Any agency that cannot tell you who it is wrong for has not thought about it.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Impactable cost?

Impactable publishes its pricing. LinkedIn Ads management starts at $3,000 a month for one channel up to $15,000 of monthly ad spend, $4,500 for two channels up to $25,000 combined, and $6,000 to $12,000 for multi channel, multi account programmes. The Demand Engine is $1,750 a month with a $1,500 one time setup, and a Channel Check is $499. Read from impactable.com on 26 October 2026.

Is Impactable a good agency?

On the public evidence, yes. It states $50M+ of B2B ad spend managed and a 5.0 Clutch rating, it was the first independent agency with an official LinkedIn agency partnership agreement, and LinkedIn itself published its Lacework case study. The reasons to look elsewhere on this page are about fit and model, not quality.

Impactable or B2Linked?

Impactable runs LinkedIn as the hub of a multi channel system with published tiers capped by ad spend. B2Linked runs LinkedIn only, at a flat $3,000 a month under $15,000 of spend and a sliding 20% to 6% of spend above it. If you want LinkedIn signals driving other channels, Impactable. If you want LinkedIn and nothing else, B2Linked. We compare B2Linked separately on B2Linked alternatives.

Do I need a signals platform to run LinkedIn Ads well?

Not to start. The biggest levers in our panel are bidding and the form: maximum delivery cost 103% more per website click than a manual bid in the same account, and one in four lead gen campaigns never produced a single lead. Fix those first. Signals tooling earns its keep once there is enough engaged traffic to act on.

What is the best Impactable alternative for a small budget?

If LinkedIn is the main channel, Kiin at a flat $2,500 a month published, though working with us needs about $5,000 a month in ad spend. In the UK, DowSocial’s 30 day set up from £1,299 gets an account built and the first campaign live. In French speaking markets, Linkads publishes a flat 1,890 a month with no commitment.

What should I ask in the pitch?

Which named people are on the account and what else they are on, what the month three report contains, how the agency bids, what it does about lead form abandonment specifically, and who the agency is wrong for. The last question is the most revealing.

Related reading

• Refine Labs Alternatives: 9 Agencies Compared (2026)
• Directive Consulting Alternatives: 9 Agencies Compared (2026)
• Powered by Search Alternatives: 9 Agencies Compared (2026)
• Ironpaper Alternatives: 9 Agencies Compared (2026)
• B2Linked Alternatives: 9 LinkedIn Ads Agencies Compared (2026)
• Best LinkedIn Ads Agencies (2026)
• LinkedIn Ads Agency Cost 2026: Fees, Pricing Models, Ranges
• LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks 2026
• Kiin Pricing